Eyes in the Sky: How Drones Are Transforming Firefighting Operations

Shows a drone in flight

In an era where wildfires are larger, more frequent, and increasingly unpredictable, fire departments are turning to a new ally in the sky: drones. These nimble, high-tech tools—once considered futuristic gadgets—are now essential components of modern firefighting strategy. From enhancing situational awareness to improving firefighter safety, the integration of drones into firefighting operations is rapidly reshaping how incidents are managed on the ground.


A New Perspective on the Fireground
Traditional firefighting has long relied on ground-level observation, which can be limited by terrain, visibility, and accessibility. Drones provide real-time aerial views that help incident commanders make faster, more informed decisions. Whether it’s a structure fire in an urban environment or a fast-moving wildfire in a rural area, drones can quickly survey the scene, map the perimeter, and identify potential hazards—without putting personnel at risk.
Thermal imaging capabilities further enhance a drone’s value. With the ability to detect heat signatures through smoke or at night, drones can pinpoint hotspots, locate victims, and track the spread of fire with remarkable precision. This technology is especially useful during mop-up operations or when visibility is poor due to heavy smoke.


Boosting Safety and Efficiency
One of the most important benefits of drones is their contribution to firefighter safety. By reducing the need for manual reconnaissance in dangerous conditions, drones minimize exposure to heat, collapse zones, and toxic environments. During wildfire operations, drones can scout routes, monitor fire behavior, and even track the location of ground crews in real-time to avoid entrapment scenarios.
Drones also streamline resource allocation. With real-time data, command staff can better position engines, air support, and crews based on current fire behavior and potential threats. This means faster response times and a more coordinated attack.
Another key tool in this workflow is GIS—Geographic Information Systems. GIS allows departments to capture, analyze, and visualize spatial data from drone flights, including fire perimeters, terrain elevation, and population density. Integrating drone imagery with GIS helps planners and command centers make smarter tactical decisions based on geography and infrastructure.


UAS Teams in Action: A Real-World Example
Several departments across the U.S. have established specialized Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) teams. A standout example is the Los Angeles Fire Department (LAFD), which launched its UAS program in 2019. The department now uses drones for structure fires, hazardous materials incidents, swift water rescues, and more.
The LAFD first utilized drones during the Skirball Fire, which occurred from December 6 to December 15, 2017, in the Bel Air neighborhood of Los Angeles. This marked the department’s initial deployment of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) in active firefighting operations. During the Skirball Fire, drones provided real-time situational awareness, allowing incident commanders to assess fire perimeters, identify hotspots, and make informed decisions without placing firefighters in hazardous areas.

Looking Ahead
As drone technology continues to advance—with longer flight times, stronger sensors, and AI-powered analytics—its role in firefighting will only expand. We may soon see autonomous drones that monitor fire-prone areas 24/7, or systems that integrate drone feeds directly into mobile command dashboards.
In a profession built on rapid response and adaptability, drones offer a powerful edge. They’re not replacing boots on the ground—but they’re giving those boots a smarter, safer, and more informed path forward.

Why Banning Ranch (Frank and Joan Randall Preserve) Needs Proactive Fire Management

The Frank and Joan Randall Preserve, also known as Banning Ranch, is a 387.6-acre stretch of coastal open space located in unincorporated Orange County, situated between two residential communities in Newport Beach, California. This wildland preserve features a diverse ecosystem including riparian woodlands, coastal sage scrub, and native grasslands—all of which carry a high wildfire risk, especially during extreme Santa Ana wind events.

High-Risk Wildland Next to Homes: A Recipe for Disaster
These vegetation types, while ecologically valuable, are highly combustible. Without proper vegetation management and wildfire monitoring, they pose a significant threat to the adjacent Newport Beach neighborhoods. This threat is not theoretical—it’s historical.

Two local examples illustrate the potential for disaster:

In the 1980s, a wildfire originating from Banning Ranch burned into the Newport Crest Community, destroying a condominium.
In the 1993 Laguna Fire, flames moved from Emerald Bay into Newport Coast, stopping only at Newport Coast Drive. At the time, the area east of Newport Coast Drive was undeveloped, sparing structures from damage—but the wildfire spread unhindered until then.


The Palisades Fire: A Wake-Up Call for Newport Beach
The Palisades Fire, which ignited on January 7, 2025, along the Temescal Ridge Trail in Topanga State Park, bears alarming similarities to conditions in Newport Beach’s Crystal Cove/Newport Coast area. This fire progressed rapidly from wildland to residential areas, exemplifying the three dangerous phases of such events:

Wildfire
Wildland-Urban Interface Fire
Urban Conflagration
Other tragic precedents include:

The Oakland Hills Fire (1991)
Boulder County Fire, CO (2021)
Maui Wildfire, HI (2023)
These events prove that even high-income, well-developed communities are not immune to wildfire destruction—especially when vegetation abuts homes and emergency response systems are strained.

Systemic Emergency Response Gaps
The January 2025 Los Angeles fires exposed ongoing operational issues, particularly with California’s mutual aid system. This system, designed to mobilize fire suppression resources statewide, routinely fails under pressure. During extreme events, up to 75% of structural damage occurs within the first four hours, yet resource deployment lags behind, a shortfall documented during the 2018 Camp Fire in Paradise but still unresolved.

The Case for Annexation and Local Oversight
To prevent a catastrophic wildfire event, Banning Ranch must be brought under the jurisdiction of the City of Newport Beach. As the area transitions into a public park, its use by residents and transient populations will increase, raising fire risks—as seen in Talbert Regional Park in Costa Mesa, adjacent to the Newport Beach Terrace townhomes.

Only through direct oversight by Newport Beach, including active vegetation control, fire mitigation planning, and ongoing patrol, can we ensure a safe future for both the preserve and the surrounding community.

Key Takeaway:
Wildfire risk in Newport Beach is real and growing. Proactive annexation and local land management of Banning Ranch are essential steps in protecting lives, homes, and natural resources from the next major fire. For more information, check out this interview with U.S. Senator and founder of an aerial firefighting company, Tim Sheehy, and this interview with Orange County Fire Chief Brian Hennessy.

Grand Jury Report on Fire Department EMS in Orange County

The recently published document by the Orange County grand jury regarding the deployment and response of resources by Orange County fire departments to emergency medical calls for service is both stunning, and concerning in the inaccuracies, opinions, and falsehoods presented as fact. The determinations made appear to be based on these failures or research, and lead to what may be a pre-ordained belief, without factual support. Because this document rehashes a 2012 effort of a similar matter, I am disturbed by the need for another review that fails to build on the earlier discussion.

Fundamentally, the local fire department deploys resources designed to respond to and to mitigate the unwanted effects of the environment on life, property, and the environment itself. Albert Einstein is quoted as saying that the environment is “everything but me,” referring to himself at the time. Except for specifically law enforcement related matters, unrelated to unwanted fire, this defines the responsibility of fire department emergency response. The two most time sensitive, or emergency responses, include fire suppression and emergency medical/rescue code-three (with lights and siren) response. The fire service is truly a multi-mission operation that serves to address many of the emergency needs of the community. The capability of the local fire department is only limited to the funding and leadership provided by the governing agency decisionmakers.

To fully understand the importance of emergency response it is necessary to carefully consider the concept of time, and the influence of time on the growth of uncontrolled fire and patients in extreme medical conditions i.e., coronary, stroke, blood loss et al. In all these situations the outcome is directly related to timely intervention. The sooner that trained personnel, operating efficiently, arrive at the scene and begin fire suppression or medical treatment the more likely that a desired outcome is probable. There are three components to the total response time of a fire department: call processing time, turnout time, and travel time. The only component that cannot be manipulated to a great extent is travel time as rescue personnel can only travel so fast through the city streets to arrive at the scene of an emergency.

The distribution of fire stations across the land mass of a city like Newport Beach serves to place fire department rescue personnel near potential fires or medical emergencies under static conditions. During times of fire department system stress due to uncontrolled fire i.e., Emerald Bay and Coastal Fire recently, in Orange County and specifically Newport Beach, a rapid and integrated system is employed to shift similar resourced into areas of reduced coverage. This was recently demonstrated and reported to the City Council in a timely fashion by the fire chief regarding the Coastal Fire in Laguna Hills. Rapid intervention serves the people you, and your fire department serve.

Of the two identified time sensitive functions of the fire department, fire suppression and medical/rescue, resource deployment should be considered for the need based on a timely response to the incident, or potential incident. Because the building stock of a community changes slowly over time, the deployment of firefighting resources and staffing at the local firehouse responsible for initial fire suppression efforts should be based on factors related to risk, occupancy type, and travel time to all areas of initial responsibility, or first due for the resources staffed at that firehouse. Earlier intervention of fire should equate a smaller fire that is extinguished faster, requiring fewer total resources from neighboring firehouses. This concept should result in a more efficient operation that has fewer fire stations assigned to a fire and committed to a fire outside the first due area.

Because the community will need the firehouses staffed for fire suppression needs, the use of these same firefighting personnel for emergency medical/rescue response was seen as a wise use of taxpayer funds. The report fails to understand the wisdom of this important concept, and in fact fails to consider this altogether. Fire apparatus, fully equipped to perform all the multi-mission functions, and available 24/7 unless committed to a prior emergency is the gold standard of the business. The idea presented to staff a two-person medic unit in place of a “second” engine at the Laguna Woods firehouse fails to consider the multi-mission functions of a fire station that protects a large hospital, a very busy complex of freeways, and housing with mature residents who will need additional support under emergency circumstances. That Laguna Woods firehouse is staffed in that fashion because it is the busiest firehouse in a densely developed county of over 3 million residents. Drawing broad conclusions based on a limited, and often false understanding, has resulted in a bad recommendation.

I found it unusual that Newport Beach in particular, with a somewhat unique deployment of resources only matched by the City of Orange, was not mentioned in text of this report. This was especially noteworthy as the thesis of the report was focused on resource deployment, city operated ambulance services, and the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA). The limited investment by the OC grand jury into the research on this important subject only serves to support the idea that the effort was biased from the start and will provide ample information for those intent on diminishing the value of a future OC grand jury report on a similar subject.